*


All times are UTC + 1 hour



Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:43 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:09 am
Posts: 518
JS wrote:
Brent4336 wrote:
You all seem to love my inclusion of the concept of risk...

You all? Delusional. I, for one, don't even remotely like it.

Brent4336 wrote:
Its pretty clear that I'm not gonna let you guys get the last word.

Regrettably, this is not an influential approach. It mostly makes you seem silly. Confused too; guys can't plurally have the last word.

Brent4336 wrote:
You should have let it die a long time ago, but some of you just cant!

A good chuckle from this... admittedly entertaining, although possibly not the way you intend.


Tell ya what, you post one more time and I'll just condede that yall are just too damned smart and mature for me! Such debate skill from up there on that high horse. Seriously if you insist on posing as an intellectual then maybe bring an issue to talk about rather than attempt to psycho analize via one liner! Your comentary on my use of language instead of any real point relevant to the conversation just comes off as holier than thou!


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:02 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 6:25 pm
Posts: 758
Location: Vancouver
Brent4336 wrote:
...maybe bring an issue to talk about rather than attempt to psycho analize via one liner!

Brent, condensed posts tend to make points more effectively. Long winded posts (especially ones that repeat the same content over and over again) are usually glossed over or ignored outright.

Brent4336 wrote:
Your comentary on my use of language instead of any real point...

I think you're confusing me with someone else. I've generally commented on your insults and challenges toward other forum members.

Your commitment to have the last word is duly noted, but ironically you addressed it in a post directed to me by name, when in fact you'd posted nine times (at some length) between my short posts. One could be much harsher toward you, Brent, as some have.

Cheers,
James


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:42 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 1565
Location: The Naki
hmmm airstyle, wakestyle.... both freestyle in my book. just different forms of something very similar. one is unhook and low the other is hooked in and high.

i prefer watching jumps/tricks with height. the low level stuff not matter how technically impressive is boring as cricket to watch.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:19 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 1593
Location: Miami @ 6" Flat Butter!
Brent4336 wrote:
@ Dr. breakwind

Careful I think your alchemy is off you forgot the pathos in your ethos!
No I didn't :nono:
Be careful, what kind of Logos you're promoting around here :naughty:
People might misunderstand you:)))

DrLW


Attachments:
Triangle of Rhetoric.jpeg
Triangle of Rhetoric.jpeg [ 29.77 KIB | Viewed 453 times ]
Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:27 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 5:36 am
Posts: 7859
Location: Oahu
As much as I love passion I never understand the need to use name calling. It will never solve anything.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:53 am 
Offline
Medium Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:16 pm
Posts: 156
Location: Jamaica
plummet wrote:
hmmm airstyle, wakestyle.... both freestyle in my book. just different forms of something very similar. one is unhook and low the other is hooked in and high.

i prefer watching jumps/tricks with height. the low level stuff not matter how technically impressive is boring as cricket to watch.



completely agree , although i love cricket :nono:


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:21 am 
Offline
Medium Poster

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:36 pm
Posts: 181
plummet wrote:
hmmm airstyle, wakestyle.... both freestyle in my book. just different forms of something very similar. one is unhook and low the other is hooked in and high.

i prefer watching jumps/tricks with height. the low level stuff not matter how technically impressive is boring as cricket to watch.


Clearly you have never watched cricket my friend. 5 days drinking in the sunshine of a tropical country away from the missus, has a better sport ever been invented?


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:38 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 6:52 am
Posts: 623
JamesVegas wrote:
away from the missus, has a better sport ever been invented?

Agree, "Away From The Missus" is the best sport there is or ever will be.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:10 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 1565
Location: The Naki
JamesVegas wrote:
5 days drinking in the sunshine of a tropical country away from the missus, has a better sport ever been invented?


5days drinking and watching cricket? my absolute worst nightmare. infact 5 days watching anything and not doing. i'd rather be nagged at by the missis.

5 days in the french alps riding mountain bikes your best buddies? priceless! or 5 days on a tropical island kiting until i bleed. that would be epic. I am not a watcher. I do. I do not watch.


Ok quote some yoda.

Do or do not there is not try.

I can adjust that to my ethos.

Do or do not there is no watch.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Toby in NY Times
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline
Rare Poster

Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 9:57 pm
Posts: 46
Awesome "new" old school! Not at all emabarrasing...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKEprkubuJE

Awesome wakestyle!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecr7w_N_kho

Look at 1:06!!! :) Beautiful!

Peace!


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: artemis_clyde_frog, Phil and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group