*


All times are UTC + 1 hour



Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Windwind SAFE system
PostPosted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 6:23 am 
North applied for a patent on this long ago.


{ SHARE_ON_FACEBOOK } { SHARE_ON_TWITTER } { SHARE_ON_ORKUT } { SHARE_ON_DIGG } { SHARE_ON_MYSPACE } { SHARE_ON_DELICIOUS }
Top
 Post subject: Re: Windwind SAFE system
PostPosted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:11 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 1771
Location: Miami @ 6" Flat Butter!
980725 wrote:
North applied for a patent on this long ago.

:blabla: :blabla: :blabla: :blabla: :blabla: :blabla: :blabla: :blabla: :blabla:

Bullshit,

Than what's the patent number if "long ago"? :?:

If they applied for why not use it? :?:

The 5th Element is completely different animal isn't it? :?:

DrLW


Top
Profile
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 4:51 pm 
Offline
Medium Poster

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 5:39 am
Posts: 100
Location: Portland, OR
The Windwing system is definitely very different from the 5th element, but I'm wondering if it might be the same idea as the 2004 North Buster kite. I haven't seen the North Buster up close, but from a distance, it looks like kind of the same idea. Dwight or someone else on this forum must know the answer.

Spencer


Top
Profile
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:54 am 
8)


Top
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 4:15 pm 
Offline
Medium Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 5:04 pm
Posts: 162
Location: Pacific Northwest
Spence,

The North Buster is not a line load transfer. The front and rear lines are independent bridles, which is a distinct difference. We at Windwing R&D have been researching many different bridle combinations for quite some time. It has been a challenge to take a different approach and being SAFE is our number one goal. Being SAFE and keeping it simple is a "mission statement" for us.

Regards,

Windwing R&D


Top
Profile
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 5:36 pm 
Offline
Medium Poster

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 5:39 am
Posts: 100
Location: Portland, OR
Hi John,

Thanks for the clarification. The SAFE system does sound pretty cool. Keep up the good good R&D work!

Spencer


Top
Profile
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:00 am 
Offline
Rare Poster

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 5:52 am
Posts: 7
[quote="John B"]Spence,

The North Buster is not a line load transfer. The front and rear lines are independent bridles, which is a distinct difference. We at Windwing R&D have been researching many different bridle combinations for quite some time. It has been a challenge to take a different approach and being SAFE is our number one goal. Being SAFE and keeping it simple is a "mission statement" for us.

Regards,

Windwing R&D[/quote]


Hey, John, we had some discussion of this issue in Texas over the weekend. It turns out that the diagram you've posted of the Windwing SAFE system is functionally identical to the Buster bridle -- something we started playing around with in the summer of 2002. PCT was secured some time ago, which isn't to say you can't use it. Just thought you should know.

Very best regards, Ken Winner


Top
Profile
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:46 pm 
Offline
Medium Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 5:04 pm
Posts: 162
Location: Pacific Northwest
Ken,

Good to hear from you! First of all I would like to aplogize to Spence. You are a sharp kiter with lots of style. Thanks for staying uptop this issue!

The Buster looks similar, however the use of pulleys at the kite would make it loose or very tippy, and even more so with higher attachment points. Maybe that's why you didn't venture too high on the LE.

We do not use pulley's, but use resistance with higher points on the LE. There are key components to make the system work. Sloped "wide wingtips" keep the system locked down while riding with min. input. When you need to tip the kite it's there not loose but tight. The static lines also provide rigidity to the LE. in the closed posistion. The "CC" pulley bar provides the resistance and keeps the system tight.

If you did file a PCT in the summer of 02, that gives you a year "03" to form your patent. Please help me out here, where is the #.... I searched... Did you let it fizzle away? Don't get me wrong I respect your contributions to kite design.

Thanks,
Windwing R&D


Top
Profile
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:51 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 1771
Location: Miami @ 6" Flat Butter!
John B wrote:
The Buster looks similar, however the use of pulleys at the kite would make it loose or very tippy, and even more so with higher attachment points.

We do not use pulley's, but use resistance with higher points on the LE. There are key components to make the system work.
Sloped "wide wingtips" keep the system locked down while riding with min. input. When you need to tip the kite it's there not loose but tight. The static lines also provide rigidity to the LE. in the closed posistion. The "CC" pulley bar provides the resistance and keeps the system tight.

If you did file a PCT in the summer of 02, that gives you a year "03" to form your patent. Please help me out here, where is the #.... I searched..


Even if the Buster looks similar to Windwing's SAFE system from a technical point of views the conbinations of details and refinements,
makes it to work in reality in a different way. I call this method the "Kinematic Inversion of Recon".

Than it's patentable because technically, functionally different and improved,
so as the claims will be different, inspite of the fact of presence of the prior art.

PCT is the catch.
It can be extended for more than 2 years for business purposes or etc. for prior art advantages,
without disclosing the abstract or issue the patent.
This way nobody would have a clue and would give the extra edge to the inventor against competitors,
like looking for a black cat in the dark.

It's not really the patent what is important but how to market it and how to protect it.
Appears to be there are many ways to skin the cat,
but the line load transfer of Windwing's works slightly in a different way which makes the foundation strong IMO.

Thank you John and Ken for the details,

DrLightWind

Flown Arc type, Foil type and L.E.I. kites and found neither one are perfect as people;
But each one has it's good point of applications. Also flown Recon, 5th line, 5th E. and Aventout systems.


Top
Profile
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:06 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 1:44 pm
Posts: 582
Location: italy
rigth doctor

It works like that but in this case (as in most of..) I think nobody is going to get a penny out of this (patents I mean).

Nice to see that much kindness in officially allowing .... somebody, in a forum .
First time in my experience.

and now ?? what's going to happen ?


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: COOP, elliott george, Google [Bot], Lubo, motosprzet, surfbird and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group