Forum for kitesurfers
-
Rojek
- Rare Poster
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:20 pm
- Local Beach: :(
- Favorite Beaches: Hamata Egypt
- Style: Newschool
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby Rojek » Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:35 pm
Hello,
Can anyone compare these two kites?
I tried RPM 2011 and liked it, but i heard many good opinions about Zeeko. Could someone write a short review of Krush with all negative features too.
Thanks,
Rojek
-
KappuhH
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:30 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
1 time
-
Been thanked:
8 times
Postby KappuhH » Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:27 pm
I did not ride the RPM, but I own a full quiver of Krushes (12/9/7).
The 12 is very fast for its size. I've compared it to the 12m Best Taboo 2012 and the Krush is a lot faster.
The 9 is also fast, I think average for a 9m.
The 7 is less fast while flying. I realy like it. However, when you are pulling for a kiteloop the kite flies faster and faster, realy great!
Main characteristics of all the Krush:
- Fast
- Explosive
- Direct barfeeling (and you know exactly where the kite is)
- Super stable
- A lot hangtime
For me there are no real negative points. The only thing some people mention is the performance in the lowend. You have to work hard to get the power you want. When you have more speed the power is enough to perform your tricks, also in the lowend. And when you ride a lot waves, the Notus should be a better choise I think.
Besides that, the ERA option is great for snowkiting, low wind kiting and teaching.
-
RAL INN
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:58 pm
- Local Beach: Sandy Point
- Favorite Beaches: Pt Danger, Torquay, Aust.
Sandy point, Aust.
Nananu-i-ra, Fiji.
- Style: freeride/waves
- Gear: Zeeko Krush 12m, 9m, Notus3 10m.
Bhoot130x 39 TT, Zeeko Slash surfboard
- Brand Affiliation: Naish, Zeeko.
- Location: Victoria, Australia./instr+retailer www.krakentours.com
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
-
Contact:
Postby RAL INN » Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:14 am
My experience with RPM's is minimal but I did get the impression they would be better compared with the Zeeko Notus.
-
funalex
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 1:00 am
-
Has thanked:
87 times
-
Been thanked:
96 times
Postby funalex » Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:02 am
krush1 and krush 2 are totally differents, we found here that krush2 is better than a rpm in pure freestyle, where krush1 were slightly difficult to place perfectly during a move, krush1 is more oldshcool oriented, where krush2 is pure freestyle kite, really easy to unhook.
the slack is easy to find with krush 2, compared to rpm, where ot's more smooth but less predictable.
for sure 2 really good allround/freestyle kite.
a french comparison :
http://forum.flysurf.com/parlons-matos/ ... rush%20rpm
-
KappuhH
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:30 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
1 time
-
Been thanked:
8 times
Postby KappuhH » Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:12 pm
Funalex, I don't share that opinion. I've ridden the Krush 1 for a year in 12/9/7 and I'm now on the Krush 2, also 12/9/7. The Krush 2 has definitly more hangtime and the Krush 1 had some more boost (especialy in kiteloops). But the differences are not that big that you can say that they are totally different.
-
mig27
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:54 am
- Local Beach: Kijkduin, Scheveningen
- Favorite Beaches: Brouwersdam, Slufter, Grevelingendam, Rockanje
- Style: strapless hydrofoil and wave
- Gear: Zeeko Notus5 5.5m
Flysurfer Speed 5 12m
Zeeko 2015 Pocket board
Zeeko 2016 Carbon freeride foil + racewing
Nobile woodskim 129x50 (with foil mast inserts)
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Rijswijk, The Netherlands
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
-
Contact:
Postby mig27 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:20 pm
Having owned the Krush1 and now owning a 9 en 7 Krush2, I have to say I do agree with funalex!
The Krush1 9m is more difficult to loop with more boost than the follow up version.
Indeed the Krush1 was a slightly better jumper and performer in the old-school range, since it had a lot of performance already in the low-end. The K2 has definitely more high-end and a bigger wind range!
Return to “Kitesurfing”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Baptiste_FR, Brent NKB, bshmng, EscSpace, Exal, Gonzavala, Google [Bot], Hessel, htsc, Smeagle, X-Fly, Yahoo [Bot] and 356 guests