*


All times are UTC + 1 hour



Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:08 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:04 pm
Posts: 526
Location: USA
Hi Plummet :thumb:
Attachment:
Switch Kite Specifications.jpg
Switch Kite Specifications.jpg [ 166.21 KIB | Viewed 763 times ]

plummet wrote:
it would interesting to know the changes in projected AR for different kite styles.
for example the projected ar of a C kite should be alot less than the project ar or an sle with the same AR......


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:44 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2507
Location: The Naki
Hansen Aerosports wrote:
Hi Plummet :thumb:
Attachment:
Switch Kite Specifications.jpg

plummet wrote:
it would interesting to know the changes in projected AR for different kite styles.
for example the projected ar of a C kite should be alot less than the project ar or an sle with the same AR......


interesting. its bizarr that the switch wave kite has the highest projected a/r. i would have thought the wave kit would have the lowest....


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:43 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:04 pm
Posts: 526
Location: USA
The Method is the least 'C' shaped or the models listed resulting in a higher projected span. In the realm of contemporary inflato traction kites, AR (projected or flat,) is not really a true predictor of performance unless all other variables are the same.
plummet wrote:
interesting. its bizarr that the switch wave kite has the highest projected a/r. i would have thought the wave kit would have the lowest....


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:07 pm 
Offline
Medium Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:37 pm
Posts: 146
Peter_Frank wrote:
BWD wrote:
Aspect ratio = ((wing span)^2/surface area)
So a hypothetical 12m kite shaped like a flat rectangle when unrolled, with a 5.4 AR has a span of 9.2m and chord of 1.3m.
Really kites aren't shaped so simply, and other factors are considered but that's the idea.


Formula is correct, and the easy way to measure (but numbers are not...)

Aspect Ratio = span / average width.

Area = span * average width.

Meaning AR = span^2 / area.

So your 12m2 kite with an AR of 5.4 has a span = sqrt(AR*area) = sqrt(5.4*12m2) = 8.0 meter.

And an average width = span / AR = area / span = 1.49 meter.


I dont agree that "numbers" are just marketing, so you simply lay your kite out flat on the ground and measure the span from tip to tip, and use the nominal size printed on the kite to calculate the AR.

That works fine - and most kites are relatively okay in their size measurement, is my experience.

Even if a 12m2 kite actually was 13m2 - the error in AR calculation will only be about 7 to 8% which is not bad really :rollgrin:


Of course, like others point out - the AR is only one parameter, as whether the area is in the middle or the tips, and how flat/c the kite is, means much more.

But for those interested in this number, using the written area and the measured span is fine IMO :thumb:

Agree that it is also interesting to measure a kite up precisely yourself, if you want to know the exact size.


Why do so many use the term "12m" about a 12m2 kite ?

The word constellation 12m does not exist as an area measurement in Danish nor German, and also lacking in most other languages, so why do so many english speaking say "12m" ?
Simple lazyness, or old bad habits or ?

:D Peter


This is not a true way to calculate the aspect ratio. You can have the same aspect ratio for different sized kites and if you use your calculation logic then different size kites will have different aspect ratios.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:17 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:45 pm
Posts: 1469
Location: The Gorge
Peter_Frank wrote:
Why do so many use the term "12m" about a 12m2 kite ?

The word constellation 12m does not exist as an area measurement in Danish nor German, and also lacking in most other languages, so why do so many english speaking say "12m" ?
Simple lazyness, or old bad habits or ?



Because there is no such thing as "12m2", it is 12m², but most keyboards do not have a way to produce that character. Everyone know what you're talking about when you say you have a 12m kite.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:39 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 5645
Location: Denmark
dyyylan wrote:
Peter_Frank wrote:
Why do so many use the term "12m" about a 12m2 kite ?

The word constellation 12m does not exist as an area measurement in Danish nor German, and also lacking in most other languages, so why do so many english speaking say "12m" ?
Simple lazyness, or old bad habits or ?



Because there is no such thing as "12m2", it is 12m², but most keyboards do not have a way to produce that character. Everyone know what you're talking about when you say you have a 12m kite.


Sorry if explained wrong then - I meant that in "talk" many english speaking say 12 meter kite...

And this "term" is not used in most other languages, where it is named (translated of course) 12 squaremeter kite :thumb:

Just a silly thing I've noticed :roll:

:D Peter


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:53 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 5645
Location: Denmark
Kiteus Maximus wrote:
Peter_Frank wrote:

Aspect Ratio = span / average width.

Area = span * average width.

Meaning AR = span^2 / area.

So your 12m2 kite with an AR of 5.4 has a span = sqrt(AR*area) = sqrt(5.4*12m2) = 8.0 meter.

And an average width = span / AR = area / span = 1.49 meter.

:D Peter


This is not a true way to calculate the aspect ratio. You can have the same aspect ratio for different sized kites and if you use your calculation logic then different size kites will have different aspect ratios.


I dont understand ???

It IS the very defintion of aspect ratio, so nothing one can change about that.

Just see the numbers Hansen uses - the very same calculation of course, and also giving approximately the same AR for different sizes :thumb:

Even though some brands also have lower AR for their smaller kites, so just different choices...

:D Peter


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: Calculating Aspect Ratios
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:26 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 5645
Location: Denmark
Great so see some exact examples Hansen.

It shows that instead of the pre 2000 size scaling of 1.36 it is up to 1.8 for the most hardcore freestyle Switch C kites like the Combat.

And for the Method it is 1.42 so much closer to the pre 2000 "standard" sizing.

This is of course because the very first kites (Wipika Classic) were VERY wide in the middle, and tiny tips (and 2 lined) - so looking way more like present delta kites or the Method V2 or similar, thus having a similar projected factor, almost no matter how flat or not :D

The C or more C like kites with wider tips (really fast turning), like the Fuels and Nitro-Combat-Element has a factor between 1.6 and 1.8 apparently 8)

Nice to see some real numbers, thanks :thumb:


The Wipika Classic around 1.36 projected factor, actually quite low compared to later C kites:

Image



And another type with a REALLY low projected factor:

Image

Paragliders, to take a comparison to maybe the most flat types, typically has a projected factor between 1.1 and 1.2 only !

:D Peter Frank


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], flyingfishza, GregK, Hasse, jjm, keegster17, NHKitesurfer, omg, Thor SFBay, Xtream and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group