Thx Ronnie, I wish people could be more like this overall..and perhaps especially in kiting. It is all about trade offs. Great kites have less negative trade offs, but they are all design choices that have consequences for a variety of characteristics.ronnie wrote:Strutless is not a revolution, its just a kite with different characteristics.
It will gain in some areas and lose in others. If you like what it gains more than what it loses then its going to suit you, if not it wont.
Not all strutless kites are the same, so what goes for one does not go for another.
IMO they are here to stay, simply because of the simplicity (when its done right).
When someone comes up with something like a C-Quad that is practical - that will be a revolution.tautologies wrote:Thx Ronnie, I wish people could be more like this overall..and perhaps especially in kiting. It is all about trade offs. Great kites have less negative trade offs, but they are all design choices that have consequences for a variety of characteristics.ronnie wrote:Strutless is not a revolution, its just a kite with different characteristics.
It will gain in some areas and lose in others. If you like what it gains more than what it loses then its going to suit you, if not it wont.
Not all strutless kites are the same, so what goes for one does not go for another.
IMO they are here to stay, simply because of the simplicity (when its done right).
Realizing that something works for some and not as much for others. I know what I like and what I am looking for in a kite.
...from a guy who has neither seen nor tried one. There is a virtual ton of proof of exactly the opposite of what you are saying.eree wrote:i bet rrd didn't make bigger sizes because they couldn't manage heavy fluttering and impossible waterlaunch...
it's a lot more likely that their LE and canopy shaping strategies didn't scale easily to 15m+.i bet rrd didn't make bigger sizes because they couldn't manage heavy fluttering and impossible waterlaunch...
Would have to see the same size in the same wind to compare properly with the RRD, but I think this is the 8m Cloud C1 being looped by Ryan Toaspern.BWD wrote:Well Tom, maybe nobody would like that.
But the Cloud is not like that in my opinion.
Since you bring it up, with the Cloud, it's more like this:
The first 6 inches of bar throw give you more depower than you get from most kites by moving the bar that amount, and little or no luffing/flapping.
Keep sheeting out and the luffing starts, and so does the drift.
Sheet out too much, maybe a foot and a half (like if you take the kite out in too much wind for the first time) and the canopy luffs a lot and makes noise.
Give it a try before condemning it.
The RRD emotion kite looks nice to me.
If Aummm hates it, it can't be all bad!
It is higher AR, but looks like it keeps stability by having more "bow" traits, smaller tips but maybe more coning. It would be nice to see a better video showing it reacting to more sheeting and maneuvers. It seems like strutless is still not the way to go for kiteloops, there is just not enough inertia to keep the tip rotating and finish the loop fast, or so it seems from the video.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Brent NKB, ChielSter, Chriz76, Deaimel, eloico, Exal, Google [Bot], Hessel, hookedcook, i_love_storm, jsanzperez, suisd12, tilmann, Vivo3d, Windigo1, wowkitesurf and 476 guests