.
Laughingman wrote:RichardM wrote:Dimitri M wrote:Guys just wanted to let you know that PEA ISLAND has been closed for Kiteboarding. Just got a "Warning" from the (US & WildLife Service officer).
So in few words you are not allowed to kite in the sound or on the ocean starting from south of the Oregon bridge all the way down to Rodanthe.
.
I’m surprised that you weren’t a good enough little sheeple to volunteer your SSN. Perhaps this extraordinary resistance to tyranny (which of course is necessary for your own good) indicates that you are actually a terrorist or an evil extremist. At least you gave Officer Secret Name your DL # like a good Amerikan - despite that you weren’t operating a “vehicle” for which a DL is required.
However, for those of us who might doubt the accuracy and/or truthfulness of Officer Secret Name’s allegation that you were violating some LEGAL regulation/law, perhaps you could state what the illegible portions say. Specifically,
what is the “Offense Charged” and what is the “Offense Description” ? Hopefully, this info will provide us subversive doubters with the ability to actually LOOK UP the supposed regulation/law which you seem to have ADMITTED violating. It also looks like the time of the alleged “Offense” was
“10:40 P.M.", which seems somewhat unlikely.
Thanks.
Richard M.
Malibu Kitesurfing - since 2002
(310) - 430 - KITE (5483)
http://www.MalibuKitesurfing.NET
kfRichard@MalibuKitesurfing.NET
Offense charged: violate special regulation
Offense description: launch/recover kiteboard - New Inlet
Thanks. I thought that's what it said. I just couldn't believe it.
William Munney wrote:RichardM wrote:Bille wrote:@ Richard
Why so cynical ? I Don't get it ! And that's coming from
someone that actually kinda sorta Likes Ya -------------sometimes.
Bille
Unfortunately I have lost all patience with kiters who are
too wimpy, gutless, apathetic etc. to even PRETEND (even if only as a BLUFF), that they think that they MAY still have some SHRED of their "rights" left - let alone actually make some minuscule ATTEMPT at preserving whatever may be left.
And the foregoing
goes DOUBLE for people in the industry, who SHOULD be at the forefront.
Richard M.
Malibu Kitesurfing - since 2002
(310) - 430 - KITE (5483)
http://www.MalibuKitesurfing.NET
kfRichard@MalibuKitesurfing.NET
None of those adjectives even remotely apply to Dimitri.
As far as I’m concerned
EVERY one of those adjectives apply to ANYONE who sucks down an UNDISCLOSED SUPPOSED “VIOLATION” of some ALLEGED “special regulation” without fighting it. Obviously, IF there is a LEGAL “special regulation”, it has a NUMBER so that it can be LOOKED UP. If it does NOT have a NUMBER so it can be LOOKED UP, even here in the land of the supposedly very, very free, I’ll bet
it is ILLEGAL and SHOULD be FOUGHT on that basis ( as well as on various OTHER grounds).
As far as I’m concerned
EVERY one of those adjectives apply to ANYONE who sucks down a SUPPOSED “VIOLATION” consisting of SUPPOSEDLY “launch/recover kiteboard” without fighting it. It SAYS that your hero either launched OR recovered his “kiteboard” OR did BOTH these things and that SUPPOSEDLY these hideous crimes are “violations” of the SUPPOSEDLY legal “special regulation”.
Do you think that you wouldn’t have a slight chance of getting a supposed “regulation” thrown out -
so that it couldn’t be used against OTHER brave kiters in the future - that makes it SUPPOSEDLY illegal to “launch” a “kiteboard”? Or “recover” a “kiteboard” ? Obviously, most of the BRAVE kiters reading this post can LEGALLY kite there since they NEVER “launch” “kiteboards” and to “recover” their “kiteboards” is harmless (besides being too vague to be enforceable).
Furthermore, I’ll bet that unless this alleged violator courageously ADMITTED he committed these vile offenses, Officer Secret Name
would have had to have SEEN him do so - he could not LEGALLY be cited based upon an ASSUMPTION that he committed the offenses.
In this vein, according to the ticket, Officer Secret Name apparently could NOT specifically
IDENTIFY the alleged “regulation” other than to allege that it is “special”,
didn’t know whether the alleged “violation(s)” consisted of launching OR recovery OR both launching and recovery of the “kiteboard”, doesn’t appear to identify
WHERE these alleged “violation(s)” occurred (at the same place or different places), and alleged that they occurred at
10:40 AT NIGHT.
So apparently, your hero
could not be bothered to fight as bogus a ticket as you could imagine thereby HELPING TO PROMOTE the arbitrary and probably completely illegal denial of access based upon the whims of people such as Officer Secret Name. On the other hand, fighting it would have at LEAST increased the POSSIBILITY that access could preserved, or even, God forbid, INCREASED.
In fact, since this particular alleged violator has such a large following of faithful admirers and is able to generate more publicity and support than virtually ANYONE ELSE in the industry, as far as I’m concerned,
he has a greater DUTY to resist this type of tyranny and therefore in this instance my opinion stated above goes
TRIPLE.
Richard M.
Malibu Kitesurfing - since 2002
(310) - 430 - KITE (5483)
http://www.MalibuKitesurfing.NET
kfRichard@MalibuKitesurfing.NET