The luff curve is the curve of the leading edge, not the profile or foil shape.Pump me up wrote:- The most important aerodynamic aspect of any kite, after sheer size and aspect ratio, is the LUFF CURVE (profile depth).
Some foils sit just as high in the window, if not higher. They tend to have stability issues. Foil zealots will usually blame the riders skills.- Rams are unable to handle the shear stresses and turbulence at the very edge of the window because they lack a semi-rigid structure. This is why inflatables like the X3 are superior to rams. They sit closer to the edge of
the window,
The Rhino 2 sits further back with good solid bar pressure and outjumps or at least matches any other kite currently on the market. Kites that fly too far to the edge of the window suffer at the low end and hang time. Its definitely not black and white.enabling flying off the front lines, low bar pressure, extreme penetration to the top of the window (enabling very high jumps) etc.
Nope. They don't jump worth beans because they turn too slow and accelerate poorly out of a turn. What do you think is the mass of all that air inside a big foil? It has neutral boyancy in air but it all needs to be accelerated regardless.- Because large rams (eg Warrior 16.5) have a HUGE "D" coefficient compared to inflatables, they are unable to generate the sudden upward power spikes.
It's supremely easy to outpoint 99% of all riders (foil or tube) because they just don't give a crap whether they are getting max vmg. Unless you race other racers it's pointless to make this claim. And if you do win, congratulate yourself on you skills first and choice of equipment second. Anyways, 99% of us don't care.sq225917 wrote:1. fact one, i'll outpoint any lei rider in any wind condition for upwind ability riding a psycho, lei's do not penetrate as far upwind as foils and are less effeicient designs primarily due to their tiny projected area....
Completely irrelevant, how a kite flies unloaded.2. my roughly put together demo titan quite happily outpoints any lei from even a static position on the beach,
Putting reflex in your profile adds stability and decreases performance. When you deform your profile you are introducing canopy distortions, increasing drag. It's not a win/win situtation. In order to get a lot of aoa adjustment out of a foil profile, you need heaps of reflex. To get performance you want less reflex. Pick your poison.do you seriously expect people to believe that a static wing system with only pivot from the leading edge attachments points, such as your x3 can be more efficient than a soft foil that has a totally adjustable foil profile. have you even seen the psycho, they have a fully cambered and adjustable profile, not just angle of attack, they are a reflex design, not just a pivoting sheet like an lei.
The x2 has top notch stablility. It far outperforms the psycho on this criteria.3. leis more stable at the edge of the window, thye aren't more stable not the x2 i used last week, with the titan, or the mach 1 i used all saturday, they were just the same. if youd tried a new set of foils and had the skill to handle them, you might find this out.
You can fly either one in too little wind to relaunch. One of them you can jump, the other is cruising only. Whatever rings your bell.just as big foils turn slowly so large leis are ridiculously heavy and impossible to relaunch, the 16 warriro is equaivilanet in pull to a 22m lei, so lets compare like with like.
The ultimate ironysq225917 wrote:i find it funny that people are letting themselves get drawn into this.
bottom line, leis are just simpler more basic kites, with less performance and less adjustability, simple kites for simple people....
Having limited sailboat experience, I was interested in learning more about "luff curve". This what I found on a web search.Max Air wrote:The luff curve is the curve of the leading edge, not the profile or foil shape.
Could you give us a link?KiteGlider wrote:Having limited sailboat experience, I was interested in learning more about "luff curve". This what I found on a web search.Max Air wrote:The luff curve is the curve of the leading edge, not the profile or foil shape.
Relating to sails, boat and windsurfer, luff curve is the depth or belly of the sail. The sail cloth/material is cut to allow excess to give profile or "depth".
So the amount of luff curve being one of the mast deformation factors that introduces dept or foil profile into the sail.mast deformations possible : luff curve, rotation, rake and inclination. -
Luff curve seems specific to sail design. When talking LEI profile shape IMO we're considering geometry in terms of air-foil design.To understand mast tuning one must know a little about how a sail is designed and what gives it its shape. Seam taper and luff curve are the two main components to sailshape and depth. Seam taper (also known as broadseaming) is the depth built into the sail. Seam taper has a percentage depth (percentage of chord length), a maximum draft position source of the shape you see in your main when you are sailing. When you put a positive luff curve on a straight mast the extra cloth (beyond the straight luff) is cloth added to the depth of the main. Most of added shape appears in the luff. How much luff curve is the question most often asked by sailmakers.
Users browsing this forum: basti52406, bittersvolcom, Brent NKB, bshmng, cglazier, Da Yoda, jjm, lander, lightwind, Manxman, Pitu, thatwildtype, Tiiga, Trent hink, Vivo3d, Xtream, Yahoo [Bot] and 704 guests