Well, not really.
One can always fly the kite lower, if long lines - but you can never fly it higher, with shorter lines.
But to take the example from your link, one can calculate quite easy, having :
1. "Line" length from sea level to kite power 27m @ 60 degree angle. Height over water = 23,4m
2. "Line" length from sea level to kite power 22m @ 60 degree angle. Height over water = 19,1m
Above is very typical, if you got say 17m versus 22 meter lines, and there is typically 3-5 meter to the power center of the kite (bridles + tip to powercenter), and leader lines at the bar + the rider height.
So from the graph the wind is
1. 19,5 knots @ 22m lines
2. 18,9 knots @ 17m lines
So the wind difference is only 3,2% which equals 6,5% in terms of power (squared).
If you took a 12m2 kite instead of a 9m2, that would equal a power difference of 33% !
Which is way more difference than the 5m longer lines, that only gave you 6,5% more power.
So you COULD say, that going from 17 to 22m line length, you would only increase the kite power by 1/5 of a kite size jump (or 1/3 if only jumping from 10 to 12m2), which is really not much, right ?
But as the feel and way you can cut power away fast is much more important, the 17 to 22m difference will feel like a lot more, in powered conditions
And reversed, you can FLY much more power with the 22m than the 17m lines, in the lowend.
So the wind gradient important in itself ? Naaa, not IMO.
Peter