*


All times are UTC + 1 hour



Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:08 am 
Offline
Frequent Poster

Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 10:38 pm
Posts: 204
When all the lift is created by the frontwing and the rearwing is there mostly for traction/stability why are most of the rearwings curved down or up in the tips? 
Its logical in the frontwing to reduce wing tip wortices, but for the traction rear wing the pressure should be 50/50% up/down so a straigt foil should create less drag, so why?


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:24 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:39 am
Posts: 946
Guttorm wrote:
When all the lift is created by the frontwing and the rearwing is there mostly for traction/stability why are most of the rearwings curved down or up in the tips? 
Its logical in the frontwing to reduce wing tip wortices, but for the traction rear wing the pressure should be 50/50% up/down so a straigt foil should create less drag, so why?

According to the aerospace industry, the wingtips will create 10% or so of better efficiency.


Attachments:
image.jpg
image.jpg [ 12.8 KIB | Viewed 446 times ]
Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:12 am 
Offline
Frequent Poster

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 2:18 pm
Posts: 365
its called end plate effect, fooling the flow into thinking that the surface is larger than it really is and setting up a tip vortex.

its great on planes and stuff that moves at 500mph in AIR

not sure exactly how well it all applies to water at 25mph..due to completely different densitiy (air vs water) rapid changes in angle of attack and being so slow its not even funny


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 10:55 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 1:00 am
Posts: 5628
Location: Denmark
Guttorm wrote:
When all the lift is created by the frontwing and the rearwing is there mostly for traction/stability why are most of the rearwings curved down or up in the tips? 
Its logical in the frontwing to reduce wing tip wortices, but for the traction rear wing the pressure should be 50/50% up/down so a straigt foil should create less drag, so why?


Correct !

Well, almost, as I think there could be a slight downward lift on some, in order to get a neutral trim at different speeds, or the opposite for beginner foils, but that is an extremely small contribution, close to and sometimes zero I think.
That is another issue, not important here...


So you are right, the stabilizer could just be flat/straight for minimum drag.
I also believe many, actually most foil stabilizer wings ARE flat, right ?

But curving the stabilizer can be used instead of having a rudder (yaw stability).
Some also make the stabilizer in a "V" to avoid having a rudder.

This way is also used in planes, to avoid drag and mechanical nuissance :D
Although, it is a bit of a religous item also, like many design features unfortunately still is :roll:

Apart from drag and yaw stabilizing effects, some also want to avoid having the stabilizer in the direct wake turbulence of the main wing at the same time, so having a different curve or V than the main wing, means the stabilizer is never fully in the turbulence shade, but only part of it :thumb:

8) PF


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:00 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:39 am
Posts: 946
Water density is 2000 times more dense than air at crusing altitude, so even at 20 times slower speed than airplanes. The effects of the wing tips are more profound on the hydrofoil.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:16 pm 
Offline
Frequent Poster

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 2:18 pm
Posts: 365
i give up...

all hydrofoils should be flat have no tail stabiliser have a pair of twin tip fins bolted to them and ideally not achieve a speed greater than 15 kts, the use of carbon or any composite should be severely limited wherever possible a heaven help you if you produce a wing without Anhedral (contradicting the earlier bit about flat wings and twin tip fins) but you conveniently ignore that bit...

your plane wing scenario has a surface area how big compared to a hydrofoil? hydrofoils have an idiot stood on top of it giving the most basic of trim commands and has non movable surfaces (currently)

and lastly for your plane wing picture to be 'right' you have put your twin tip fins on the wrong side of your front wing...


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:37 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:39 am
Posts: 946
The wingtips are more effective on high AR wings like passenger planes, less effective on low AR wings like jet fighters. The gliders were among the first to adopt the wingtips. They were first pointed down like a hydrofoil, but passenger planes pointed up due to landing clearance.


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:47 pm 
Offline
Frequent Poster

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 2:18 pm
Posts: 365
hahaha!

they pointed up due to clearance issues?

they point up due to pressure migration around the tip of the wing from the bottom to top surface that creates a tip vortex that if left unchecked adds drag, by adding the tip section it helps keep the airflow attached for longer and lends the airflow around the wing a smoother release and less drag and therefore better fuel economy.

landing clearance issues? seriously where do you get this stuff?


Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 7:26 pm 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:39 am
Posts: 946
Point up or down or both ways, they all do the same thing. It just make more sense to point up on the airplane and point down on the hydrofoil.


Attachments:
image.jpg
image.jpg [ 76.19 KIB | Viewed 235 times ]
image.jpg
image.jpg [ 73.48 KIB | Viewed 237 times ]
Top
Profile
 Post subject: Re: foil design
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:19 am 
Offline
Very Frequent Poster

Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:58 pm
Posts: 656
Hawaiis wrote:
Guttorm wrote:
When all the lift is created by the frontwing and the rearwing is there mostly for traction/stability why are most of the rearwings curved down or up in the tips? 
Its logical in the frontwing to reduce wing tip wortices, but for the traction rear wing the pressure should be 50/50% up/down so a straigt foil should create less drag, so why?

According to the aerospace industry, the wingtips will create 10% or so of better efficiency.


from memory: induced drag is generated by lift, i.e., no lift -> no induced drag (aka wing tip vortices)

so if the rearwing is there without generating lift then those tips do not make much sense, not for the purpose of reduce drag / increase efficiency

also to note that they may reduce induced drag, but always increase surface drag. you need to add them both to see if the whole picture make sense

... now: back to the game of thrones


Top
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic
 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group