Page 14 of 17

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:41 am
by SlimShaddy
I luv how you run your mouth and then when someon calls you on your shit, you go back to you well to pull out more...

You're a joke.

:bye:

slim

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:50 am
by vietkiter
SlimShaddy wrote:I luv how you run your mouth and then when someon calls you on your shit, you go back to you well to pull out more...

You're a joke.
So did I point out the right evidence of my libelous way? Help me out here... after all... you are the superior legal mind... you do quote my libelous statement... I still have no clue... please help... quote please

Really... people aren't laughing at me... they are laughing at your stupidity to accuse of all people vietkiter as a Best hater... what a wanna be Best tool you are

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:59 am
by sq225917
vk was calling the criminalty of those who damaged the property and goods of best employees and riders, not best.


scott: you are way off the mark with your knowledge of Bests early activities, we came direct to customers becasue no shops would stock the kites, as they feared fallout from disgruntled distributors who supplied their other brands and didnt have space for another brand.

the intention has always been to do without distribution, doing it without shops initially was the only way into the market and it also gave us the margin back to be able to run the 3 for 2 for so long.

in effect it was retailers reluctance to take the brand that allowed best to sell direct and pass the saving direct to customers in the shape of the 3 for 2 deal.

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:03 am
by sq225917
[quote="ScottM]Many a consumer has suffered by the second rate products they sold in their early days.


[quote]

maybe you could ellucidate this with a fine example...

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:07 am
by ScottM
Hey SQ,

Thing is everything about your business works fine. Best website, best service, nice design (Waroo Pro) but your PR on this forum sucks!! I don't know your whole story, but I think you guys went about things the wrong way personally in the beginning. Not perhaps from a business point of view, but from a gaining respect point of view I think so.

My reference to second rate, is that your designs, (pre 05) or the ones we've seen, Hellfish, BFK and the others just haven't matched the equivalent models of the same year from other brands. To quantify it by numbers isn't possible, but the general consences from fellow kiters is they just don't match the Rhinos, Contras. I've seen them all fly and I'd agree.

When it comes to flat kites, this appears to be a different story, having seen some poor offerings from other brands. I would secretly admit that I enjoyed my session on the 16m Waroo and if Cabrinha didn't have their stuff I'd grudingly be forced to buy one.

I have no doubt you guys have the passion about your brand, but when Gumball starts threads like this one it just ain't cool. The guy probably has too much spare time right now with the broken leg, but I don't think it excuses it personally.

And the fellow is right in that threads like this just bring the worst of people!!

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:12 am
by ScottM
Has the world gone mad???? :roll:
vietkiter wrote:
SlimShaddy wrote:I luv how you run your mouth and then when someon calls you on your shit, you go back to you well to pull out more...

You're a joke.
So did I point out the right evidence of my libelous way? Help me out here... after all... you are the superior legal mind... you do quote my libelous statement... I still have no clue... please help... quote please

Really... people aren't laughing at me... they are laughing at your stupidity to accuse of all people vietkiter as a Best hater... what a wanna be Best tool you are

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:59 am
by SlimShaddy
sq225917 wrote:Many a consumer has suffered by the second rate products they sold in their early days.

maybe you could elucidate this with a fine example...
Say while we’re at perhaps VK give the examples & merits he based his comments of unethical behavior that lead to the criminal behavior statement on.

Please enlighten us all and provide the details to both side of your ‘cause & effect’ equation.

Least we not forget, or be spun to believe otherwise, but it was VK’s legal genius that first lead us all off on the this tangent/bunny hole

slim

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:00 am
by SlimShaddy
ScottM wrote:

You are right in that regard, should have read though more carefully while typing in the heat of the moment.


I'm guilty of that as well.

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:45 pm
by vietkiter
SlimShaddy wrote:Least we not forget, or be spun to believe otherwise, but it was VK’s legal genius that first lead us all off on the this tangent/bunny hole
Hey... too proud for an appology? it's okay... vk doesn't need nor care... but stop with the stupid pretense that you didn't tooled ya self...

I believe the 'tangent' started with you threatening to 'educate' ScottM's bunny hole with your 8cm...
SlimShaddy wrote: Criminal behavior?!?

Nice work VT & Scott you just crossed the line of talking smack & Libel….

Very good Mcflys, very good

Fargon dumb-asses.

Sq & alex…

I’d personally have my lawyers help ‘educate’ these self righteous whack asre fragon posers… but that’s just me…
I can't expect you to listen to Best haters like vietkiter... but shouldn't you be respecting the wisdom of your Best hero...
sq225917 wrote:vk was calling the criminalty of those who damaged the property and goods of best employees and riders, not best.
SlimShaddy wrote:I'm guilty of that as well.
Criminal Best tool u r...

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:49 pm
by sq225917
whats with the third person all of a sudden vk,are you turning into fo. :wink: