world's leading kitesurfing website
https://kiteforum.com/
I have been told that some Toby erased some accounts for this kind of language.Mulholland wrote: You French would be speaking German, you would be a bad person or dead
Mulholland wrote:Nobody with a half a brain thinks of "America" as anything other than the United States. There are South Americans, Americans and Canadians -- rather common usage.webhiker wrote:1)America is a continent, not a country. 2 continents in fact. Of course I don't blame you, I blame your pathetic and failing education systemGiven America is the freest, wealthiest, most generous country on the planet, furthering our political interests by supporting countries friendly to us, is a good thing. They win, and we win, and the scumbags lose.2)You give money only to further your political agenda, and use it as a tool to strong arm countries into accepting military bases, regime changes, fundamentalist religious views (e.g. pregnancy termination favourable countries are excluded from receiving aid) etc etc
Little newsflash for you, communist, a lot of countries don't want your unborn baby murder in their countries, and therefore we shouldn't support the abortion profiteers in those countries.The families of the millions tortured and killed by Saddam, including the Kurds, are very thankful we are there. Of course if France had their way, as they didn't want to lose their oil contracts, Saddam would still be filling mass graves, torturing innocent people, raping women, and starving people to death.3)The thousands of dead Iraqis thank you for liberating them. So do the increasing numbers of dying Afghanis. However the thousands that were massacred in Burundi, Kabul, Bosnia etc (where coincidentally there is no oil) wonder what happened to the "liberators".
You French would be speaking German, you would be a bad person or dead, if America didn't save your sorry cowardly hides...We fought for peace in WWII (56 million died), and we are fighting for peace now (infinitely less casualties).
The innocent Iraqis and Afghanis have a chance at freedom and peace, but the UN, France, Germany, China, Russia and the American Democrat party keep attempting to sabotage their success, and our success, because the neo-socialists are evil to their core.What a fool you prove youself. People fight to get out of dictatorships, not into them. People risk their lives to enter America, including the Vietnamese who we attempted to liberate, Cubans and Mexicans, and even French who suffer under your failing socialistic country. Our poor people look wealthy compared to the rest of the world.4)Dictator, massive wealth unequality (sic) - you mean like the USA?
solo flight wrote:Another CO2 neurotes,piss on the USA thread,jippieee.
Educate yourselves before condemning CO2.
Yeah, you said that...we should all stay respectful....solo flight wrote:And I agree we should all stay respectfull,and remember we're not alone on this planet(man shit happens here while you type your mindfarts)
thought the thread was about "China, Kites and greenhouse gases" ??????solo flight wrote:piss on the USA thread
In the USA. Which is why I mention, you need to get out more. If Brazil is "South America", where T F is Mexico?Mulholland wrote: Nobody with a half a brain thinks of "America" as anything other than the United States.
Can you even remember when last you won a war?Mulholland wrote: Given America is the freest, wealthiest, most generous country on the planet, furthering our political interests by supporting countries friendly to us, is a good thing. They win, and we win, and the scumbags lose.
And yet you have no problems killing adults in your exclusive death penalty club along with other esteemed members such as China, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Can you spell hypocrisy?Mulholland wrote: Little newsflash for you, communist, a lot of countries don't want your unborn baby murder in their countries, and therefore we shouldn't support the abortion profiteers in those countries.
We're talking about the same Saddam Hussein the CIA funded and put into power in the first place right? You should hold your head up real high about that one.Mulholland wrote: The families of the millions tortured and killed by Saddam, including the Kurds, are very thankful we are there. Of course if France had their way, as they didn't want to lose their oil contracts, Saddam would still be filling mass graves, torturing innocent people, raping women, and starving people to death.
Ah yes, the only case in history where hundreds of thousands of civilians were innocently targeted and killed when you dropped an atom bomb on a civilian target? Once again, I salute your high moral ground.Mulholland wrote: You French would be speaking German, you would be a bad person or dead, if America didn't save your sorry cowardly hides...We fought for peace in WWII (56 million died), and we are fighting for peace now (infinitely less casualties).
They have no chance until your illegal occupation puts it's tail between it's legs and gets out of Dodge, just like you did in Vietnam.Mulholland wrote: The innocent Iraqis and Afghanis have a chance at freedom and peace, but the UN, France, Germany, China, Russia and the American Democrat party keep attempting to sabotage their success, and our success, because the neo-socialists are evil to their core.
Yes, you must be proud of all your school shootings (USA only phenomenon), Guantano abuses, Abu Graib, Paris Hilton, WWF, Dick Cheney, Fox News. You guys are the best.Mulholland wrote: What a fool you prove youself. People fight to get out of dictatorships, not into them. People risk their lives to enter America, including the Vietnamese who we attempted to liberate, Cubans and Mexicans, and even French who suffer under your failing socialistic country. Our poor people look wealthy compared to the rest of the world.
It seems to be up to us to lead every other war regardless of whether we had anything to do with causing it. Why would global warming be any different. I do agree though. If the government insists on pissing away a billion dollars a day, it ought to go toward something that will benefit the taxpayers that are funding it.marcfrm wrote:surfingwithkites wrote: It will then up to the US to lead the war against global warming. This should be in any case more usefull and less troublesome than the so called "war on terror".
Well, in the case of global warming the U.S. comprises 1/25th of the world's population, and is responsible for more than 30% of the greenhouse gases. So I'd say it's fair that we lead the charge to a solution (since we sure as hell led the charge to destruction).rossc wrote:It seems to be up to us to lead every other war regardless of whether we had anything to do with causing it. Why would global warming be any different.