kiterguy wrote:This one seemed pretty good / objective.
Svensmark is anything but objective. He is among a very rare breed - a skeptic with an education. However, even if you take only what he says, you find he isn't really much of a skeptic. He DOES believe the climate is warming, and he DOES believe we're playing a part in that.
His claims as to the natural causes for the current warming however have been debunked to my satisfaction, but far more importantly, to the satisfaction of the global scientific community. I assume that community has ready access to all the information (not just the data that supports anthropogenic global warming), and I assume that as a whole they are honest and doing good science.
In my way of thinking one would need some extremely compelling evidence to side with the extreme minority of scientists. I haven't seen any such evidence.