Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

x2 vs Fuel 2003 performance and construction. Any opinions?

Forum for kitesurfers
BLOWN AWAY
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2371
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 1:00 am
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Postby BLOWN AWAY » Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:43 am

The fuels have a rep for being really powerful kites and if the 2003 models turn really well like people say they do.... then it sounds like they are the ultimate kite for light winds..... Although a large X2 is not a worthy comparision in terms of low down grunt....

BLOWN AWAY :cool:

BLOWN AWAY
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2371
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 1:00 am
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Postby BLOWN AWAY » Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:47 am

Naishes best contender for light wind superiority isn't the X2 but the AERO... Thee 20m AERO pulls hard and the AERO II is rumoured to steer faster than the X2.... that should give a better contest to the Fuels and Rhinos in terms of 8 knot shredding....

BLOWN AWAY :evil:

Guest
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Postby Guest » Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:50 am

A torquey kite that steers fast = a great kite for light winds........ that's a simple law of physics....

BLOWN AWAY :smile:


Return to “Kitesurfing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: adiver, Aleza, CaptainKook, Deaimel, eloico, Guttorm, ham-er, Hessel, jjm, knotwindy, Labskaus, Leon van Bergen, lightwind, Pepijn, rw30, tilmann, Xtream, zerogee_ca, zlatko23 and 320 guests