|
| Author |
Message |
|
Guest
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2001 12:53 am |
|
|
|
|
who can answer this question yet?
-x-surat
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
murdoc
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2001 10:18 am |
|
 |
| Very Frequent Poster |
 |
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2001 1:00 am Posts: 1949 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
|
can't answer for shure....
but i suppose, that the 2002 aero might have more power than the 2001 arx - but not as much as the 2002 arx... (or arpro or what the heck they call it)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Guest
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2001 7:25 pm |
|
|
|
|
the aero has slightly lower aspect ratio than the ARX but, it's easier to water relaunch. The battens at the end and the adjustable tip on the aero makes it a bit faster compared to the ARX. So at the end I think you get the a very similar performance but the aero is easier to deal with when it falls and "wobbles" less in the air when depowered. The new ARX should give you a bit more lift but i believe you have to be a very good kiter to appreciate the difference. I think most will find the aero an easier kite all together, it follwos the same footsteps as the 2002 slingshots fuels and the north rhinos.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Guest
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2001 7:32 pm |
|
|
|
|
do you know if the aero or any other of the 2002 has a panic hook on the depower to get out in dangerous situations?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
sage
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2001 2:24 pm |
|
 |
| Rare Poster |
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2001 1:00 am Posts: 18 Location: babylon, uk
|
|
The Aero is more agile and will boost higher, the ARX has more hang time. A good combo could be the bigger Aero's and smaller ARX?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: alexeyga, Google [Bot], RedStar and 22 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|