C4 vs SP-X

magnus_norway · **Joined:** Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:29 am **Posts:** 109

naishdude wrote:

(...) and now this looks like a nice mixture from RPM/C4. And now the comments are gonna be look at the details and every kite looks the same...but here it is a bit too obvious to MY opinion...and I am open to any reaction and or cirtisism, I just express what I think..and see and make up my mind from

Yeah, we're probably stepping on a lot of toes right now, so sorry about that...

But I was thinking the same thing when I saw the vid above... I thought it looked a lot like the RPM, and also with a little touch of Hadlow Pro with the even number struts so the middle of the canopy is "strutless". Not saying it's a bad kite, it's probably really good, just not revolutionary, since others have done it before...

R a i n e r · **Posted:** Tue May 04, 2010 7:02 pm

BLACKJACK wrote:

...you sound like 78kg guy :?:

'Good one! :lol:

Well, how does a 90kg-guy sound?
('Just kidding)
82kg is my weight :wink:

...and btw: Q, SP-X and X19 have definitely been developed by Spleene.
(I'm not the Rainer from Spleene, but I know him well :wink:

)

smakki69 · **Joined:** Tue May 04, 2010 8:44 pm **Posts:** 1

I liked both kite's quite a lot but my final decision between the ozone C4 and spleene SP-X: n. due to valve materials, price and im intressed alot about the spleene announced X-19 lightwind foilkite witch will have same bar as SP-X .ozone C4 valves does not simply work on hard and cold weather, I live in the neighborhood of Santa Claus and here is extremely cold at winter time :thumb:

But if you live in warm place where sun is always shining and lot of bikini girsl and no polarbears eating them from the beach :naughty:

the choice is yours

both are awesome kite's

C4 vs SP-X

Who is online