Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Find reviews of kites, boards and accessories
Franklin
Rare Poster
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:30 pm
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby Franklin » Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:44 pm

I recently received the kite and have had a chance to inflate and inspect it. I'm very pleased with the quality of the product's materials and construction. Very much looking forward to an outing.

I've attached pics for those who are interested in seeing more of this kite.
Attachments
2011-12-08 17.17.55.jpg
2011-12-08 17.17.22.jpg
2011-12-08 17.17.05.jpg
2011-12-08 17.16.36.jpg
2011-12-08 17.16.20.jpg
2011-12-08 17.16.03.jpg
2011-12-08 17.15.45.jpg

windrupted
Frequent Poster
Posts: 209
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:14 am
Local Beach: North Beach, Barney Line, The Wood in Ventucky, Island Park Idaho and Mt Hagin MT
Favorite Beaches: G-Land (Plenkung Point)
Style: Waves, Goofy or Switch
Gear: Craigslist
Brand Affiliation: Charles Shaw
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby windrupted » Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:52 am

Mr. Franklin
Nice pics. It's a very interesting kite for use as a light wind machine. What I want to know is: how does it compare to say, a 10m Nitro. How much do you weigh? Please describe how much lighter it is than the standard Nitro, per weight. Will it reverse launch? Does it feel tail heavy, or has that been corrected? Please post with some real information. I need one of these kites, if it works. One post eh.....so who are you? Not putting up with any more forum brand cheerlearder bullshit. Thanks.

RedStar
Medium Poster
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:26 pm
Local Beach: Oulu
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby RedStar » Thu Dec 29, 2011 9:02 am

Can you fly this as 4line and with ozone bar?

FGS
Rare Poster
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:28 am
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby FGS » Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:36 am

RedStar wrote:Can you fly this as 4line and with ozone bar?
I actually use it with a 2010 ozone bar, but the connections on the kite are inverted (knots on centerlines, loops on the back), so you have to add an equal lenght short knot-knot line on centerlines and a knot-loop on backlines.
windrupted wrote:Mr. Franklin
Will it reverse launch?
No, I try this kite only 3 times, and in very light wind (max gusts 8.5 knots, before the kite falls I was able to stay upwind with a raceboard :thumb: ), in deep water I wasn't able to relaunch, in stronger winds pulling a backline works.

RedStar
Medium Poster
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:26 pm
Local Beach: Oulu
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby RedStar » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:51 pm

FGS wrote:
RedStar wrote:Can you fly this as 4line and with ozone bar?
I actually use it with a 2010 ozone bar, but the connections on the kite are inverted (knots on centerlines, loops on the back), so you have to add an equal lenght short knot-knot line on centerlines and a knot-loop on backlines.
Ok Thanks for this. Does safety work?

FGS
Rare Poster
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:28 am
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby FGS » Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:52 pm

RedStar wrote:
Ok Thanks for this. Does safety work?
I didn't try but if you use the standard setting of the ozone bar (single front line flag out) the kite will surely depower better than connecting on two frontlines, the only issue is that re-assembling the bar is more triky. In very light wind you can connect directly to the chicken loop.

Franklin
Rare Poster
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:30 pm
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby Franklin » Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:19 pm

Yesterday was one of the periodic Phuket days with real wind - a consistent 15+kts for hours and hours. Everyone rode their 12m kites and 137cm boards, including me. Great day.

Today however, was one of those Phuket days for which I bought the 16R. Must have been between 8 and 12 kts all day. I rode the s#*t out of this kite for 2 hours, which is about as long as I can stand to ride. I don't know how people ride for 4 or 5 hours, but I suppose you build up your endurance over time.

I really like the kite and am pleased as punch for having purchased it. Pluses are that it has plenty of power. There were many times today during which me and the Speed 3 were the only ones riding, while the other 10 or so kites were in a holding pattern with riders in the water. At no time did I lack enough power to plane and ride upwind.

I don't know enough about kites, nor have I ridden enough of them to say much of value, but I'll make some more comments.

The 16R seems to turn well enough. My only reference is my Bandit IV 12m, the only other kite I've ridden. Given the size and design difference (high performance vs race), I would say the Nitro turns fairly well. Obviously it doesn't turn as fast as the Bandit, but it turned well enough - maybe about 25 to 30% slower than the Bandit.

Bar pressure is about 20 to 30% higher than the Bandit, I think, and it will take some getting used to. I did experience times when the kite let me know where it was in the sky while I was looking elsewhere, which is to say that it was careening toward the water without me realizing I had directed it to do so. I was able to recover the flight pattern, not crashing the kite. In this respect, the bar pressure served its purpose. Still though, I want lighter bar pressure. The Bandit adequately lets me know where it is in the sky, but with lower bar pressure. I may change my tune like those who have gotten used to it and thereafter prefer the Nitro bar pressure. But I'm not there yet after one ride. One thing I found that I need to confirm with another ride. It seems to me that the bar pressure is lighter if the power adjustor is set such that one can ride with the bar sheeted in at about 50%. I think I was finding that bar pressure was higher past the sheeting out half-way point, but I'm not sure about that.

The bar has a velcro strip to attach the depower adjuster when it's pulled to length. The teeth on the small piece of velcro are not substantial enough to reliably hold the depower adjustor dongle. This design feature is really nice, and I want it to work right. I really liked having the dongle secured rather than swinging around and winding itself around the center lines. Although the feature worked sometimes, it often failed and the dongle soft velcro would fall off the counterpart. I've looked over the teeth side, and there are definitely more substantial velcro teeth out there. I'm going to either need to do some kind of modification with velcro of my own, or something.

More on the power of the Nitro. I understand that power isn't the only goal in kite design. The Bandit for instance, is actually quite a low power kite. My 12m is like a 10m in another model. You really need high winds for that kite to allow you to plane - like at least 12kts, its minimum published wind range. Other 12m kites provide significantly more power. According to my understanding, the reason for these performance characteristics is to give the Bandit other strengths. In my experience, the Bandit has a lot of grunt. Even with its 3 strut design, it's a heavy kite, and it charges through the wind when directed and has very nice momentum, speed, turning, etc. As I become more skilled, I imagine I will one day greatly appreciate the capabilities of the Bandit.

The Nitro 16R on the other hand, seems to me to be a more balanced design. As is written in product literature, Switch kites are designed for efficiency, meaning I believe that they are quite powerful for their size. This power aspect of the kite's design was the reason I bought the Nitro (along with the outstanding price). I need a kite that can give me the power I need to give me a day of kiting on a typical Phuket day of 8kts, the minimum published wind range of the 16R. I can't imagine the 16R does not offer the highest relative value in a big kite. How can another big kite possibly perform better such that the performance difference outweighs the additional cost to the extent that it would offer higher relative value than the 16R? Fat chance.

Fact is, I simply couldn't have afforded a big kite from another brand this year, no matter how much better another big kite may be. Switch has given me what will probably turn out to be 20 to 50 days of kiting this year that I would have otherwise not had. THANK YOU Switch Kites!

For those who are seeking a light-wind setup, take note. With the help of Switch kites, according to what I've seen, I believe I have come up with a combo with the highest relative value. The 16R and the 2012 Aboards Glider 164 combo, which I have dubbed 'The Insurance Policy', is a day saver that I dare anyone to beat in terms of price/performance.

The 16R offers very nice power and performance for a game-changing price, and I do believe it to be the highest relative value big-kite out there. The Glider is the most ridiculously awesome light-wind board I can imagine, and not because of the size. I'm absolutely nuts about this board after riding it for the first time today. I had such a good ride on this board, and I just can't get over it. Although this board is the size of an airplane wing, the real reason why it's so spectacular is because of the science in the design. The thing they say on the product page is no bulls%*t. The board really does ride on the water in a way such that much of the board remains in contact with the water rather than rising up out of it. The result is that you feel like you're standing on solid ground compared to other boards. It's just such a good feeling to have such a substantial base rather than having that feeling that you could sink at any moment if you don't keep up that speed.

2nd design cue that makes it such a killer light-wind board, is the thing about 'pointing the rider upwind'. It's true. The board is somewhat convex, and you can direct the board to point upwind or neutral, in an almost rocking like manipulation that's very easy to implement. Rather than having to apply all of your skills to adroitly ride upwind, this board somewhat causes you to ride upwind by default. I often found myself so far away from the beach today that I was thinking 'ok, enough already. i'm out here far enough to lose some upwind progress to some lame attempts at jumping'. Just a little bit of shifting in weight and leg extension and the board sort of rocks into an upwind-pointing position with such ease. My Crazyfly Raptor Pro requires quite a bit of foot and leg muscling along with flying skills to ride upwind compared to the Glider. With the Crazyfly, you really have to focus on riding upwind unless the wind is really good. But the Glider requires a vastly lower amount of attention to point upwind and actually go there.

3rd design cue that performs as advertised is the 3d stepped pattern. The board does feel like a smaller board, and I can see that tricks should be possible. I guess this is a design element on many boards out there. Sure is neat.

So, anyway, I cannot more strongly recommend the 16R and Glider for a light-wind setup. It must be the best $/kts combo out there, if that is in fact a valid quantification.

One more short note about the 16R flying characteristics - it flies toward the edge of the wind window rather than hanging further back in the power zone as I have read some kites are designed to do.

I would guess that this design aspect is helpful in riding upwind. If the kite were to sit back further in the window, I can imagine that there would be more pull down-wind and more effort would be required to edge hard enough to make upwind progress. With the 16R, riding upwind just happens as a matter of course.

When winds are 8 and 9kts, and you're just hoping for a day of kiting, it's really nice to be able to ride upwind rather than walk until you're so tired that you just decide it isn't a kiting day after all.

I would guess that flying near the edge of the window is also good for racing, as that would seem to help with riding fast, but I really wouldn't know.

I don't know why some kites are designed to sit further back in the window. I guess there's a good reason for it, but I'm sure glad the 16R is such a good upwind flyer by way of sitting closer to the edge of the window.

Thanks for reading this poorly organized combination 16R report, bar report, and light-wind setup pimping job.

windrupted
Frequent Poster
Posts: 209
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:14 am
Local Beach: North Beach, Barney Line, The Wood in Ventucky, Island Park Idaho and Mt Hagin MT
Favorite Beaches: G-Land (Plenkung Point)
Style: Waves, Goofy or Switch
Gear: Craigslist
Brand Affiliation: Charles Shaw
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby windrupted » Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:14 pm

Great job, thanks for the thoughtful review. You neglected to give us any idea of your weight though. At 85 kilos and gaining in my old age, I found the 14m to feel overpowered quite easily and ended up getting the 10m, as I ride waves on a surfboard without any foot straps. I feel that 10 meter is almost enough to be my biggest kite, as it has so much power and speed on tap. Today I had waist high super lined up little walls and in the lull late in the day all the crew packed up and left me alone, it soon recovered and got really good. At no point did I ever stop kiting when it lulled, although I did make a few walks upwind during the worst. It was sketchy light and full of holes but that kite stayed in the sky all day. Oh, I did fall off and put it in the drink for a second or two but it kept flying.

If I could have chosen, I would have ordered my 10m in race/light construction, I enjoy the cleaner look of the 16m race version and don't like seeing that heavy color print all over my kite, all that red makes me start to feel like Jack Nicholson in The Shining...."redrum redrum...". (I don't put stickers on my car or surfboard either, in fact I peel them off if some brat pre-owned it). I think all Nitro's should be standard built race/light, and heavy duty with extra loud graphics be the option :D, as it seems to be a racy fast design and has such great low end. But as is it goes so fast and feels well balanced and survives getting pounded in surf (so far).

As far as the build quality, it is hard to imagine anything better for any price. The high volume one way fill insta-dump valve alone is so good, works so well, it is just space age when compared to my previous kites from even 2011. Then I noticed how they cleverly added a protective patch to keep it from scuffing through the fabric, where my previous kites would get pin-holes. Very impressive. Whoever is looking after the details in the design shop is really doing a good job, everywhere you look there is some better feature than even the best kites from last year. My friend's kite retails for over twice the price and looks like a toy compared (though it is a bit lighter). I can't imagine how they did all this and made them cheaper but it's good as I can order more kites (I just demoed a Method....)

Franklin
Rare Poster
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:30 pm
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Switch Nitro 16R product inspection

Postby Franklin » Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:28 pm

My weight is 64kg. I'm also very happy with the Nitro. Here are some details on the silly day I had today with it. It should give those who are interested an idea of the build quality of the 16R with trimmed down materials.

Today was total stupidity. Went out at with about 8ts. Must have gotten down to 5 or 6kts within a short while. Flysurfer even had to do a self rescue.

Due to some poor decision making on my part, I ended up hanging my 16R in some power lines about 25 meters inward on the beach, believe it. A concrete power pole was the hanging point. It propped my kite up on top of it, threatening to tear the canopy for about 5 minutes. The top of the pole was jagged concrete. It appears that the Thai production process for creating concrete poles is to simply break them into pieces. Short of dropping your kite onto a sword, it doesn't get much worse than this. Had to climb a brick wall, fight with some trees, and fiddle with the kite to get it to fall down into the trees. Then had to pull very forcefully on the LE in order to get a handle on a line that was caught up in some branches, and forcefully pull it free, ripping the branches. The stress point during that folly was the point at which the bridle connects to the LE. I was pulling very hard on the LE so the lines would rip through some branches enough that I could get a handle on the lines. Then after getting the kite out of the trees and over the brick wall there was some minor dragging on the concrete street involved before finally getting to park my kite on the beach.

All in all, there was the terrible power pole from hell, trees with a deathgrip on my lines, and then dragging on a less than smooth concrete street.

Total damage report: a 1mm white scratch where the concrete pole was jabbing into the underside of the canopy.

Hah! I may manage to find some other nicks later on. But a look over revealed no other damage than the 1mm scratch. The bridle connection points were completely unaffected by the pulling on the LE with wild abandon. And I can't find any abrasions due to the street dragging.


Return to “Reviews”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests