YEA -- Ya might be correct on that !Dr Makani wrote:
...
peace
you got to be kidding!tautologies wrote:Hey you. Yeah you.
Do you ever think about how you want to be treated when you post on this forum?
Exactly.ronnie wrote:It works best if people attack the argument and not the person.
That is one of the smartest things ever said on the kiteforum. I am sometimes guilty of not following this rule but for the most part provided I am not being attacked personally I do try to debate the debate and not the person. But if I am attacked on a personal level, well, all bets are off, but even then it is wise not to react to severely as you end up lowering yourself to a level you may not be comfortable with. Retracting or apologizing for something you have said is a lot harder then what some others do by simply deleting their posts. Those people are cowards... Even if they do love dogs...ronnie wrote:It works best if people attack the argument and not the person.
And because you refrained from actually naming this well known poster, your comment is not a personal attack ?Laughingman wrote:That is one of the smartest things ever said on the kiteforum. I am sometimes guilty of not following this rule but for the most part provided I am not being attacked personally I do try to debate the debate and not the person. But if I am attacked on a personal level, well, all bets are off, but even then it is wise not to react to severely as you end up lowering yourself to a level you may not be comfortable with. Retracting or apologizing for something you have said is a lot harder then what some others do by simply deleting their posts. Those people are cowards... Even if they do love dogs...ronnie wrote:It works best if people attack the argument and not the person.
Users browsing this forum: Aberdovy kiter, ak200, Bing [Bot], EscSpace, Hasse, jhonson, jjm, MKM, nixmatters, notamondayperson, Peter_Frank, RM, Sander O, SlingshotBM, vladi elthve, X-Fly, Xtream, Yahoo [Bot] and 402 guests