Billie,
You asked how to deal with FO.
I spelled it out perfectly,
but you fucked it up and got personal.
And you forgot to admit your a fucwad, ha..ha..
Not sticking up for Fo, he's a big boy.
Bille wrote:Yea -- Your right ; It's Hopeless !!
tautologies wrote:I started this thread because of all the shit that was going on in another thread. I don't want to call people out directly because I don't really think they would learn from that, but I think a general tone and how to deal with issues is important, and if most of the other forum users adhere to that I think overall the threads will go further.Top Down Causation wrote:I'm new to this forum so I'm curious what the heck this thread is about?
I love your username tho...are you into Social theories of network society, ant, information society?
The top down causation framework reminds me a lot about Giddens, Latour etc. or are you are strict physics guy?
I don't know too much about it, but it seems interestingTop Down Causation wrote:I dig on strict physics but regarding top down causation and of the 5 classes of top down causation I focus more on intelligent top down causation. The effect of the human mind on the physical world.
And your name is perfectly suited for an Internet discussion board. I caught the irony.
No he's right, i resemble that remark !!BigPaul wrote:Hi Billy
Have to agree with Marty on this one, except for calling you a Fukwad.
You can not have a go at Fo on a thread that is about tollarance and not expect him to defend himself.
If you rattle the cage expect a reaction.
Anyway I've always liked your post's and admired how you have over come obsticals in your life.
Well the weekend is here now and its windy - see you on the other side
Paul
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Brent NKB, Camineet, djdojo, Faxie, Google [Bot], Steve271, suisd12, tilmann, Trent hink, Yahoo [Bot], zerogee_ca and 548 guests