Forum for kitesurfers
-
rocktor
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:30 pm
- Gear: Airush
Jimmy Lewis
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby rocktor » Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:05 am
There is no kinetic energy involved on a board pop or flex at all. It is all potential energy.
-
Starsky
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:12 pm
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Ontario
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
3 times
Postby Starsky » Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:57 am
Kiteus Maximus wrote:You need to read the posts again. I've said nothing about flex being relative to adding height to a jump.
Isn't saying flex is relative to adding pop the same thing?
Were all talking about no whip airs so pop pretty much equates to height.
-
capitan nemo
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:44 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby capitan nemo » Sun Apr 07, 2013 12:02 pm
Rocker contributes more to pop and to comfort than stiffness.
Let the arguing continue
-
DirkGently
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:52 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby DirkGently » Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:50 pm
Reduced stiffness can accomodate as board shape is dynamic, increasing active rocker as the board is flexed
and KM, still laughing, explain us some more sciernce!!!
-
Tiago1973
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:58 pm
- Local Beach: Portugal
- Style: Freeriding
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby Tiago1973 » Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:32 pm
can´t see how rocker helps pop. in my mind it is easier to build load with a relatively flatter board than with a banana shape one
agree that rocker is good for the confort, particular in chop. also usefull for hot landing
starsky also mention that the top guys are using flatter boards. for sure they don´t care much about confort, but they do care about pop potential - speculating here, but it is what make sense.
but then +rocker asks for a bigger kite for the same up-wind and as most people are looking for the smallest/fastest kite it´s something that would never sell well
then this could be another explanation why the top guys are using flatter boards - guess they use what they are given to, and they are given to what it sells
-
Starsky
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 4373
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:12 pm
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Ontario
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
3 times
Postby Starsky » Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:01 am
Rocker facilitates cornering, straight facilitates going straight. The progressive edging that is popping is just easier to get done quick with a defined stiff curve between your feet.
No energy is first spent on bending the board to initiate the pop.
Your right its less efficient for planning but that's the trade off. Efficient boards I find less fun. I don't have kite bigger than a 10 and my only twintip has more rocker than any production board on the market. It's stiff and works best with boots cause its 139x43. That's enough size to make up for some efficiency and I won't even take it out of the car unless its a solid 15 knots. If I had the patients for a 12m I'm sure it would be fun down to say 12 or 13 knots.
Like the donkey dick a lot of gear is designed for the beginner. Board are made to sell, and what sells is upwind at the expense of almost all else.
Pros compete on flat boards to max speed and get back upwind quick for timed heats. Hadlow immediately went to a far more rockered board once out of comps and into boots. Same with all the non comp guys like Dre, Sam Light, Mo, Predator, Mauricio, etc. these guys can all pop huge on almost any board, but choose to ride rocker.
Return to “Kitesurfing”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bittersvolcom, evan, jannik, marinjo77, Peter_Frank, SolarSet, suisd12, Vivo3d, Windigo1, Yahoo [Bot], zloilyoha and 546 guests