BraCuru wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2017 10:07 pmIt was hard for assisting boats and rather easy job for foilers.
we had to wait for a boat which had 700hp in two engines
Waves 2m average but we had bigger ones up to 4m.
we did it on one tack. No problem at all despite we thought it could be a challenge for our legs.
great feeling to kite 2 hours without seeing a shore.
Probably 3 hours at least, because 2 hours would be a average of 50km/habel wrote: ↑Sat Jul 15, 2017 10:43 amBraCuru wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2017 10:07 pmIt was hard for assisting boats and rather easy job for foilers.
we had to wait for a boat which had 700hp in two engines
Waves 2m average but we had bigger ones up to 4m.
we did it on one tack. No problem at all despite we thought it could be a challenge for our legs.
great feeling to kite 2 hours without seeing a shore.
You actually burned 100km in two hours?
Negative! I wrote about 2 hour crossing the Baltic without seeing any shore.
in our case too.longwhitecloud wrote:the journey back was absolute hell on earth!
We afraid the most of leg cramps as we were riding almost 4 hours on one tack. Adam had it only once after 1 hour. Otherwise no problem at all. Big positive surprise.plummet wrote: Awesome. How was the back leg burn?
Users browsing this forum: bragnouff, downunder, gl, tymonkerste and 169 guests