Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

R1 vs Chrono

For all foil kite riders


plummet
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 5636
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Kiting since: 33
Local Beach: God created the naki so the hardcore people would have a place to live.
Favorite Beaches: Shhhhhhhhhhhhh...........
Style: Always searching for flow!
Gear: If you take 3.1415 from opinion. You get onion!
Brand Affiliation: What do yo call an Alligator in a vest? ............... An Investigator.

Re: R1 vs Chrono

Postby plummet » Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:55 pm

Ok. Chrono V1 is a wild beast. It brings the fire breathing dragon. Yes its less stable and more tip tucking if you fly it bad. It was the original depower race kite.R1 in is the second gen race kite. Its more stable and inflates better. Some reports have stated that R1 is not quite as fast as chrono V1.

Chrono V2 is a down tuned slightly lower aspect chrono. It has normal bridles rather than wafer thin bitches. Its more stable again and easier to fly by misses the firebreathing dragon.

User avatar
mgs
Medium Poster
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 10:55 am
Kiting since: 2000
Style: Cruising/Skimboarding/Flat Water/Waves
Gear: Ozone Chrono V1 18m
Ozone Chrono V1 12m
Ozone Chrono V1 9m
Zap Skimboard
Twin Tip
Location: England

Re: R1 vs Chrono

Postby mgs » Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:52 pm

As a Chrono V1 owner I have never had any issues with wing tip tuck other than when I made adjustments to the speed system and didn’t extend the Z line.
I have the 18m, 12m and the 9m. Pre-inflation is key for a successful launch pulling the brake handle may be necessary to inflate the wing tips.
I can’t even describe the technique for flying them, I just fly them.
Not sure the Chrono V1 deserves the name of a “wild beast” though. :-)
The Chrono V1 was the original race kite to which to the V2 and R1 is based, never flown a V2 or an R1 so not in a position to comment.

User avatar
mig27
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 750
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:54 am
Kiting since: 2002
Local Beach: Kijkduin, Scheveningen
Favorite Beaches: Brouwersdam, Slufter, Grevelingendam, Rockanje
Style: strapless hydrofoil and wave
Gear: Zeeko Notus5 5.5m
Flysurfer Speed 5 12m
Zeeko 2015 Pocket board
Zeeko 2016 Carbon freeride foil + racewing
Nobile woodskim 129x50 (with foil mast inserts)
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: Rijswijk, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: R1 vs Chrono

Postby mig27 » Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:07 am

Flown the V1 12m once, and indeed a wild beast for sure! With not much foil kite experience basically not the kite to go for.
The V2 is stable, does not overfly, much more heavy (v1 12 is approx 2200gr) and does not have the same performance.
Flown the 9 and 13m of that.
Not a racekite. Should not have the Chrono name. I know people who ordered them blind with the expectation it would the next version of the Chrono V1...big disappointment. Strange marketing from ozone.

User avatar
mgs
Medium Poster
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 10:55 am
Kiting since: 2000
Style: Cruising/Skimboarding/Flat Water/Waves
Gear: Ozone Chrono V1 18m
Ozone Chrono V1 12m
Ozone Chrono V1 9m
Zap Skimboard
Twin Tip
Location: England

Re: R1 vs Chrono

Postby mgs » Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:22 pm

Having re-read the write up from Ozone again ;-) with respect to Chrono V1 it quotes “Light wind boosting machine that also excels in racing on the water, land or snow”.
It doesn’t specifically say it’s a race kite, but being a high aspect/high performance kite makes it ideal for such purposes.
The Chrono V2 is classified a freeride kite having a mid to high aspect ratio and differs from the Chrono V1 with respect to wing shape, bridle line, intake valves to name some changes.
The Chrono V2 is still a high performance foil and simply a more “user friendly” version of the Chrono V1
This information is readily available so there is really no need to make any assumptions before you buy.
Ozone R1 Designer Talk – Comparing to the Chrono
phpBB [video]


Return to “Foil Kites”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron