Seems odd things to say...terrios666 wrote:Funny you raise issue about the bar. Long term, holding a kite over a season even for two seasons, its the bar that you often have to replace.
I'm in the same boat as you, looking at ERA and North. By far, North has the better bar and just by looking at the kites you know that the North is going to last longer. I bet the same is true for SBII, durable and will last longer.
So far heard that the ERA is a mid-range kite, not built for ultra performance and not high end. Middle of the road, and so the performance shows as well. Nothing to get too excited about but nothing to piss you off either.
The EAR sounds kind of boring? No surprises to find out about down the road once more of the riders have reported back?
Pretty sure the Royal boards are the exact same as the Undergrounds.....but with different graphics.Is the Royal One boards the same shape as the Underground Flex?
Dude! Dont get one.... Your loss.terrios666 wrote:Funny you raise issue about the bar. Long term, holding a kite over a season even for two seasons, its the bar that you often have to replace.
I'm in the same boat as you, looking at ERA and North. By far, North has the better bar and just by looking at the kites you know that the North is going to last longer. I bet the same is true for SBII, durable and will last longer.
So far heard that the ERA is a mid-range kite, not built for ultra performance and not high end. Middle of the road, and so the performance shows as well. Nothing to get too excited about but nothing to piss you off either.
The EAR sounds kind of boring? No surprises to find out about down the road once more of the riders have reported back?
I'm not sure what you have against this kite but this isn't your first post trying to spread misinformation about the ERA. Try the kite first.terrios666 wrote:Funny you raise issue about the bar. Long term, holding a kite over a season even for two seasons, its the bar that you often have to replace.
I'm in the same boat as you, looking at ERA and North. By far, North has the better bar and just by looking at the kites you know that the North is going to last longer. I bet the same is true for SBII, durable and will last longer.
So far heard that the ERA is a mid-range kite, not built for ultra performance and not high end. Middle of the road, and so the performance shows as well. Nothing to get too excited about but nothing to piss you off either.
The EAR sounds kind of boring? No surprises to find out about down the road once more of the riders have reported back?
Users browsing this forum: Aberdovy kiter, ARK, Bladebarry, Chriz76, DanielorDani, Google [Bot], headintheclouds, htsc, i_love_storm, mede, nixmatters, nothing2seehere, Peter_Frank, Pitu, SolarSet, Yahoo [Bot] and 355 guests