So......some would say that this reaffirmation of your previous statement is what you would call "doubling down". There is a current national figure notorious for this trait in his rants. A better way of expressing a rebuttal, would be to present more evidence in a logical and reasonable manner to explain your position further. This is something that the referenced leader seems unable to do. You also seem to share this trait, but that is not something I would hold against you as it is just part of your personality.
You are correct. I apologize for angering you further. I should have tempered my response in a more sensitive manner. I will try to stick to a more logical rebuttal next time. However, I must point out, that I was defending you and the "voice" you present in this forum. I was defending you against the following statement:
Ironically, you seem to hold the same position your attacker holds against you, against me. I believe this to the most telling indication of your personality as you present it in your writings on this forum. Forgive me, but I must state that there is some logical inconsistency in your thought process on this, specifically with regards to the issue you are complaining about to me.
I agree with you that we should keep talking about kiting. But the emotions come through in writing our posts are still very much a "tell tail" indicator of personal bias on the kiting issue at hand. And this "tell tail" indication establishes a base line for credibility/bias of forum participants such as you, especially when you continue to double down.
Users browsing this forum: andylc, arjas, Baidu [Spider], basti52406, DanielorDani, Google [Bot], grigorib, IvanoKite, nothing2seehere, Peter_Frank, Puddle Pirate, PullStrings, SolarSet, Ulrik, vladi elthve, WS79, y2kBug, Yahoo [Bot] and 374 guests